It wasn't playing very well with Kestrel and other managed code libraries like HttpClient. It basically is a C# wrapper around the gRPC Core library written in C. NET Core 3.0 release, you could use gRPC in your C# applications by using the Grpc.Core library. So, both technologies will continue to coexist in the next years. In short, Web APIs and gRPC use different models for communication and have different use-cases. Finally, Web APIs support browsers, while gRPC don't. The interaction model in Web APIs is client-server, while gRPC supports multiple models: from client-server to bidirectional streaming. Also, data exchanged by Web APIs are usually textual, human-readable (typically JSON), while gRPC uses a compact binary format. In addition, Web APIs are based on the HTTP protocol, while gRPC uses HTTP/2. Standard Web APIs are based on a resource-oriented approach, which is a model where a client requests a resource representation and applies simple CRUD operations on these resources. The gRPC framework proposes the RPC model, which is a model where a client invokes a remote procedure that will be executed on the server. The Web APIs, especially if inspired by the REST architecture, rely on a different programming model. There are a couple of factors to take into account. Since gRPC is so efficient and handy, why has it not replaced the well-known HTTP Web API technology? The following diagram summarizes the overall architecture of a basic gRPC-based system: Bidirectional streaming RPC: in this case, the client and the server exchange messages in both directions.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |